Dear Song Ashtear,

While it is not my normal business to get in the affairs of others, I
find myself unable to control my curiosity here. In your last post you
gave us a little hypothetical situation to wrap our minds around: "Keep
in mind; the suns do shine in your townes, as much as they do in Antioch
and our townes. Would it be in my right to threaten to take away the
light, the suns, because you will not allow me to put a shrine of Lord
Baar there? No, it would not. So keep your threats out of it..." The
last time I checked, Antioch was having snow storms. Lord Baar did take
the suns away from your city as punishment for the Wardancers (correct
me if I am wrong). It appears here, it is just as much of a right for
Lady Lianthe to be angered as much as it would be Lord Baar's right to
be angry over His situation. The only difference between the Two is that
Lady Lianthe would not be able to hold the Suns back from your city.

On the other hand, you are right that it is not Nisha's place to command
where a shrine is put, but the circumstances that surround Lady
Lianthe's shrine being removed are questionable and, from a religious
standpoint, are intolerable to the Lady.

I am not trying to make the problems worse here, especially because I
have no affiliation with either group, but I do hope you see why this is
now a larger issue than you had originally thought.

Sincerely,
Argom Pae'ganis

Penned by my hand on the 7th of Ultio, in the year 484 AD.