I really don't think a debate would be a very good idea. All that will
come of it is Antioch stating their case that all magick is bad with
counter points being made by the other two cities. And Kinsamar stating
that some magick is good and some is bad, with counter points made from
the other two cities. In the end all you will have is a shouting match
that really does not shed any new light on this topic.

A modest counteroffer from one on the sidelines, as Ithaqua is not
anti-magick but instead non-magick in certain areas, is that each city
holds a writing contest for the honour of representing their city here
on the public board with the official argument of the city's stance on
magick. In this way instead of getting a headache, we can all read and
gleam information from each post and decisions from those who are on the
fence can be made. Also, there is a small glimmer of hope that the
counterargument posts might be kept at a minimum in the manner. Although
I doubt it.

Penned by my hand on the 12th of Fas, in the year 440 AD.